|
Undoubtedly, research and technology have helped
the medical fraternity tremendously. They have also spawned varied
careers like medical transcription for instance. Telemedicine too
holds the promise of fostering health care in remote areas where
previously there was none. That is one aspect. The other is using it
to obtain specialist treatment, where previously it was imperative
that a doctor see the patient first.
The more cases a doctor sees for himself, the
more experience he gets. Relying on a machine to diagnose symptoms
might make those skills a trifle rusty. The most crucial aspect in a
doctor-patient relationship also gets lost -- interpersonal
communication. For, sometimes it is also the reassurance and moral
support a patient looks for when he pays a visit to the doctor. An
impersonal doctor can be as intimidating as the disease. How do
doctors feel then?
Dr Ashwin Dikshit, a Pune based nephrologist,
feels that there are always pluses and minuses and a good doctor
would incorporate the best of both to strike a balance.
"Technology helps tremendously of course. Telemedicine is
helping many patients both in rural and remote areas to avail of
health care facilities where previously there were none. So you
can't say that technology is entirely wrong. But it can never
replace a doctor completely. You can never treat a patient
successfully without seeing him first especially in specialized
cases. Also, a doctor-patient relationship cannot just be left to
technology. Some interaction has to be there," says Dr Dikshit.
As a nephrologist he needs to be finely attuned to new strides in
technology but draws the line when it intrudes into his
relationships with patients.
Admittedly, it's easy to get awed by the wonders
of technology. The feeling is shared by laypersons too, who might
feel more comfortable if their doctor knew about recent developments
or had the latest gadgetry. Says Bhavesh Sampat, a software
professional in Pune, "Doctors are getting more dependent on
technology but at the same time there is no denying that new
equipment and techniques do have higher accuracy. Yes, machines can
make mistakes, but then so can doctors. Instead, doctors should
ideally use technology to complement their knowledge. I would
definitely feel more comfortable going to a doctor like that."
A machine. Is that where all the action is?
Well, it's more of a half and half. Better still, if it's allowed to
remain this way. Otherwise pessimistic money games and too many
specializations will simply make doctors lose out what their
patients seek the most - their touch.
|